≡ Menu

The Children of Húrin

Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings trilogy effectively ruined all future fantasy reads for me. I followed it with Terry Brooks’ The Sword of Shannara — a bad choice. While Brooks’ series was well received, I found it a cheesy, blatant rip-off, completely unworthy of its Rings comparisons. I got halfway through the book and chucked it. Years later, having resisted any further fantasy reads, a friend swore up and down about The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant, The Unbeliever, by Stephen Donaldson. I took the series up with great cover-tolkien.jpgskepticism (and probably an overly critical eye), but read the first six books. While I wrestled with the lead anti-hero, Thomas Covenant, the series was well-imagined and different enough from LotR that I gave it a marginal nod. But at that point, I was jaded.

I went back and re-read the trilogy, then delved into The Silmarillion, a collection of Tolkien’s works, edited and published posthumously by his son Christopher, that tells of the ages prior to LotR. This second reading, more than anything else, sealed my fate. I haven’t read much — definitely haven’t enjoyed — fantasy since.

Anyway, I’ve watched with relative cynicism the latest incarnation of the Lord of the Rings saga. While the reams of extra-Middle Earth material is interesting and adds depth to the story, most of it (like The Silmarillian) lacks the narrative depth of The Hobbit and the trilogy. So many of these addendums are, to me, the piling on of an already overloaded bandwagon. But early reviews like THIS are giving me hope that The Children of Húrin might be worth my time.

* * *

And Salon. Gosh, we need Tom Bombadil!

Email this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrShare on Reddit
{ 3 comments… add one }
  • Jason April 21, 2007, 12:54 PM

    I’ve also been reluctant to read any of the sequels to LotR like the Silmarilion. I think they’re mostly aimed at existing fans. I heard the the new book was being considered as a movie. Is that true?

  • Mike Duran April 21, 2007, 4:00 PM

    The Hobbit is being made into a movie by New Line cinema, but Peter Jackson will not be directing. I’ve read several places that Hurin is being considered but Tolkien’s estate has not committed yet.

  • David April 22, 2007, 2:53 AM

    The Hobbit and LotR trilogy is hard combo to beat. Have not yet brought myself to read The Silmarillion, but my son liked it because it filled in so much Middle Earth history.

    How about a little historical fiction instead? Wings of Dawn by Sigmund Brouwer is a good and fun read.

Leave a Comment