≡ Menu

3 Reasons Why I’m Not Seeing “God’s Not Dead”

Gods-Not-Dead

I’m typically torn by most “Christian films,” as I am with God’s Not Dead, which opens in theaters this weekend. On the one hand, I believe it’s important that Christian artists and biblically themed stories reach mainstream audiences, rather than simply being aimed exclusively at churches and existing Christians. On the other hand, much that is labeled “Christian film” tends to be poorly crafted, one-dimensional, and thematically predictable.

In his article How to Respond to Christian Movies that Could Be Better Artistically, Andy Crouch offers two simple reasons why Christians should celebrate even poorly-crafted Christian films:

First, it is better to create something worth criticizing than to criticize and create nothing.

Second, one or two Christian kids with real talent somewhere in this vast land are going to see these movies, get the sacred-secular dichotomy knocked out of them at an early age, move to LA, work their tails off, dream, fail, and try again . . . and one day make truly great movies. These movies are significant not for their own excellence but for the door they open to cultural creativity that the church never should have lost. (emphasis mine)

In this sense, we have legitimate reasons to celebrate God’s Not Dead. Not only does it courageously step into a huge cultural debate (Creation / Evolution, Christianity / Atheism), the production quality of God’s Not Dead appears to be head and shoulders above typical Christian fare.

Jim Denison, President of Denison Forum on Truth and Culture offers 3 reasons to see God’s Not Dead. They are:

  • One: it shows the real-life challenges believers face, especially on college campuses.
  • Two: the movie asks us what risk we are willing to take for Jesus.
  • Three: God’s Not Dead offers the kind of evidence-based reasoning Christians need in defending their faith today.

My reaction to the film’s concept, trailer, and pre-release buzz , is just the opposite. I will NOT be seeing the film, at least in theaters, for several reasons. Let me offer three of them:

One: I distrust many Christian reviewers. Granted, this could be a very unfair reason to avoid seeing the film. Nevertheless, I am suspect of many Christian reviewers, whether of film or fiction, whose agenda seems to be to endorse Christian art no matter how mediocre. Frankly, it’s hard to believe the gushing, uncritical endorsements for God’s Not Dead when those same reviewers are handing out five-stars to Fireproof and Courageous.  To me, that says more about the Christian community’s myopia than the quality of the film. Call me overly-critical. But I’ve grown to be suspect of too many Christian reviewers. (One exception, and perhaps even more fascinating, is the number of Young Earth Creationists who are critical of the film for employing the Big Bang as evidence for God, primarily due to their belief that Big Bang cosmology speaks to an Old Earth.)

Two: The “culture war” narrative is front and center. As I’ve said elsewhere, there’s some aspects of the “culture war” mentality that I embrace. The problem, as I see it, is that God’s Not Dead goes straight for the jugular. For instance, Denison suggests that the film should be seen because it rightly portrays the “real-life challenges believers face, especially on college campuses.” I COMPLETELY agree that believers face real challenges on college campuses. The problem is when we make those challenges an apologetic unto itself, as if one reason for the existence of God is the secular academy. We set up colleges as a type of boogeyman out to stifle and suppress all Christians and further an Us-Against-Them polarity. Is this the type of image we want to lead with in theaters: Poor Oppressed Christians? Along this line, I find it puzzling that one of the lead images being presented for God’s Not Dead is the Duck Dynasty guy (see above pic). If ever there was a polarizing figure (whether rightly or wrongly), it’s him. So why align the film with such a controversial person?

Three: It trivializes a complex, important debate. Of course, many films tackle — effectively — other huge, complicated issues. But the Atheist / Christian debate continues to be one of the most tenured, heated cultural “conversations.” Having attended and listened to dozens of such debates, I can attest to the incredibly academic and potentially volatile nature of this issue. So is it possible for a film to really do justice? Especially when the objective of the film is to allow us to cheer for a specific debate winner? In a way, God’s Not Dead appears to be less an apparatus for swaying atheists than providing bullet points and inspiration for the Christian troops. Denison admits as much when he says, “God’s Not Dead offers the kind of evidence-based reasoning Christians need in defending their faith today.” Do Christians need to better learn how to defend their faith? Absolutely! But if we’re relying on a movie to do this, I’m afraid something is wrong.

As I said above, I have mixed feelings about God’s Not Dead. Christian artists and investors have put their time, talent, and treasure on the line to bring us this film. They seem to have produced a good-looking product. It’s definitely an issue worth exploring. And as Crouch said above, films like this keep Christians open “to cultural creativity.” For this reason, God’s Not Dead should be applauded.

Nevertheless, the myopic Christian bubble it exists in, the culture war narrative the film employs, and the potential trivializing of this important debate are just some of the reasons I’ll be waiting for God’s Not Dead to release on video.

Email this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrShare on Reddit
{ 8 comments… add one }
  • billgncs March 17, 2014, 9:48 AM

    Your point of view surprises me on this one. I would thought you would have viewed it and made your own opinion.

  • David James March 17, 2014, 1:45 PM

    Mike you have expressed very well the feelings I get when things like this come out. I didn’t even realize it was going to be in theaters. I’m surprised it’s not a straight to video release. The one-sidedness of this just continues to reveal arrogance on the part of some Christians. I rather felt the same way when I was listening to those guys talk after the Ken Ham/Bill Nye debate from a few weeks back. They kept talking about how Nye never answered Ham’s questions while ignoring that Ham did the same thing to Nye. Unfortunately, Christians just keep proving a lack of intelligence with this kind of lopsided behavior. Too bad, since there are Believers out there with the ability to think.

  • Katherine Coble March 18, 2014, 9:17 AM

    I think it’s both precious and arrogant that the man character’s name is “Josh Wheaton”.
    a) Jesus and Wheaton college! Namechecked!!!
    b) Everybody is gonna hear it and think “Joss Whedon”, a renowned atheist, is fighting the cause of Christianity.

    Sigh. Your cuteness, filmmakers, is appallingly condescending.

  • StuartB March 20, 2014, 8:11 AM

    First, it is better to create something worth criticizing than to criticize and create nothing.

    Is it? Is it really? Some days I wonder.

    These movies are significant not for their own excellence but for the door they open to cultural creativity that the church never should have lost.

    Which is why I support such sites like Christian Nightmares and Everything is Awful for exposing bad art. It’s a ready source of examples of what we should not be doing, and we can learn from it and move on. I just wish there was a musical equivalent type of site out there.

  • Patrick OToole April 6, 2014, 6:25 PM

    I have to agree with much of what you said Mike. I probably won’t ever watch the film. I did see Fire Proof, which was better then I expected, but I’d give it 3 out of 5 stars at best. I’ve never seen any of the others; Courageous, Titans, etc.

    As a writer, I want to watch story tellers who are at the top of their respective crafts. I watch movies mostly to be entertained and be moved emotionally. I’m not going to movies to reinforce my world view. In fact, I’m doing everything I can right now to challenge my world view to see what parts are scriptural and what parts are just 80’s Evangelical, white, middle-class American culture.

    I have been struggling with these questions: What type of stories do I want to tell? Is being entertaining enough? What message, if any, do I want in my storied and how do I do that effectively? (among many other.) But I do know I don’t want to write preachy, Christian sub-culture stories.

    It bothers me that so many Evangelical leaders promote these movies as if they’re ground breaking, must-see film making. It just makes them look foolish.

    If the “Christian” movies we make are of poor quality, have bad acting and are preachy, the unbelieving world we’re trying to engage will never see them. It just reinforced their believe that Christians are shallow, unrealistic people who believe in some myth that makes them act like fools.

    In other words, we’ve failed.

    The movie The Exorcist, which you posted on recently, is considered one of the best horror movies, if not one of the best movies in general, ever made. I’m sure that many people “enjoyed” that movie, if being scared can be considered enjoyable, and then when home asking themselves if they believe that God and the Devil were real, and if so who’s side did they want to be on. Was anyone saved by seeing that film? God knows. But here we are 40 years later and we are still talking about how powerful a film The Exorcist is and how it made the reality of the battle between good and evil real to many. I doubt we’ll be having the same conversation about “God’s not dead” 40 years from now.

    p.s. “Poor Oppressed Christians?” – God forbid that we portray ourselves that way.

  • david April 27, 2014, 8:23 PM

    I am disappointed with “Christians who bash Christians in a public forum. We have many Christian religions because we worship/believe differently. We need to support one another as long as we agree that Jesus Christ is the only way, THE truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Him!

  • Ron Williams April 28, 2014, 11:11 AM

    I thoroughly enjoyed “Gods not dead”. Yes, it was not the top quality Hollywood debacle we have all grown to love-but it was good. We should applaud the effort and be thankful we had something decent to bring the family to on a Sunday afternoon. We are to quick to see and embrace all the R+ rated crap out there and then attack the family friendly ones. Our Nation needs to get back on track with the fact that God is not dead and without Him we are heading into a bad place. We sing God Bless America but then try to remove Him from every public place. I applaud the creators of God Nots Dead and look forward to seeing the sequel.

  • David November 17, 2016, 1:28 AM

    Good day
    I feel this is one of the best movies made to show the children of God what we must do for his Names.

Leave a Comment